66% Steps Reduction

An audit of a symptom-tracking app, including a treatment shortcut that reduces the longer route from 3 taps to 1

Healthcare

Audit and redesign

Role

Product Designer

Timeline

2 weeks

team

Me

platform

Mobile App

a group of people

Make treatment settings easier to reach

I audited a symptom-tracking app and identified four issues: inconsistent back behavior, journal entries that were hard to scan, a difficult-to-find treatment route, and a dark-mode contrast concern. This is an independent audit and redesign concept.

Side by side of bfore and after of the first pain point

A Button That Looked Right But Wasn’t


On the Log Today screen, the top-left arrow controlled the calendar instead of going back. The screen used an X at the bottom as its exit action, unlike the rest of the app.


Redesigned the calendar component and its interaction pattern to free up the top-left corner, restoring the back arrow to its expected behavior.

A dynamic shot of runners in motion,

Journal entries with nowhere to land

Journal entries appeared as truncated text without titles, which made it difficult to scan or find an older entry. I added a title field and a search action so entries have a visible label and can be found more directly.

This is a proposed redesign and I have not tested how quickly users can retrieve an entry.

The clearest change: a shorter route

In the original flow, the longer route to Manage Treatment is Home, Plan Tab, More, then Manage Treatment. In my proposed flow, it is Home, then Manage Treatment. That comparison reduces the route from three taps to one, or about 66% fewer taps for this route. It describes the flow shown in the concept; it is not a measured change in task time or user success.

The fix

I fixed this by creating a component on the home screen that will take users directly to their medications page.

A person in winter gear with ski goggles

A contrast failure hiding in dark mode

In dark mode, several text elements fail WCAG accessibility standards. The measured contrast ratio was 3.35:1, below both the AA minimum of 4.5:1 and the AAA standard of 7:1. They used #810FF8 for text on #000000 background

For a health product used by people managing chronic conditions, often in low-light environments, sometimes with visual impairments, this isn't a cosmetic issue. It's a readability failure at the moment users need clarity most.

Beyond usability, it's a legal exposure according to digital accessibility laws in Australia for the private sector

"Strongly Recommended for Private Sector

While private businesses are not explicitly named in legislation, they can still face legal action under the DDA if their websites or apps are inaccessible. Following WCAG 2.2 Level AA is considered the practical legal requirement for all digital services in Australia. Adopting these standards helps private organisations reduce legal risk and demonstrate a commitment to accessibility."


Why this fix matters for health specifically

Users managing chronic conditions often check their app in bed, in dimly lit waiting rooms, or during stress. A product that's hard to read in those moments isn't just inconvenient, it fails the people who need it most.

Let's Talk

I'm most energized by projects where I can dig into complex problems, collaborate with smart people, and ship things that genuinely improve someone's day.

Comment

Oluwatobi

Open to contract work, full-time roles, and interesting conversations about hard design problems.

1

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.